NEWS CENTER
Energy Saving and Emission Reduction in Shipping: The Inevitable Path to Sustainable Development Pubdate:2025-04-15

Against the backdrop of increasingly severe global climate change and environmental pollution, the shipping industry, as the primary mode of transportation for international trade, has drawn significant attention due to its carbon emissions and pollution issues. According to data from the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the shipping industry accounts for nearly 3% of global CO₂ emissions. Without intervention, this figure could rise to 10% by 2050. Therefore, energy saving and emission reduction in ships are not only environmental imperatives but also a core strategy for the sustainable development of the industry.

I. The Importance of Energy Saving and Emission Reduction in Shipping

1. Addressing Global Climate Change

The shipping industry consumes approximately 300 million tons of fuel annually, emitting large quantities of greenhouse gases (such as CO₂, SOx, and NOx) and particulate matter. IMO's "2050 Carbon Neutrality Goal" requires the industry to reduce carbon emission intensity by 40% by 2030 and achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. Energy saving and emission reduction are the only ways to meet these targets.

2. Compliance with International Regulations

  • IMO 2020 Sulfur Cap: Mandates the use of low-sulfur fuel (≤0.5% sulfur content) or the installation of scrubbers.

  • Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII): Starting in 2023, ships must progressively reduce carbon emission intensity or face downgrading or operational restrictions.

  • EU Emissions Trading System (ETS): From 2024, the shipping industry will be included in the EU carbon market, requiring payment for excess emissions.

3. Reducing Operational Costs

Fuel costs account for 30%–50% of a ship's total operating expenses. Energy-saving technologies (e.g., optimized speed, LNG fuel) can reduce fuel consumption by 10%–20%, significantly improving economic efficiency.

4. Enhancing Competitiveness

Environmental performance has become a key consideration for cargo owners and charterers. Industry leaders like Maersk have taken the lead—ordering the world's first 12 methanol dual-fuel container ships (16,000 TEU each) in 2021, with deliveries scheduled for 2023–2024. This move not only demonstrates the company's commitment to green shipping but also advances the commercial application of methanol fuel.

II. Key Measures for Energy Saving and Emission Reduction

1. Technological Innovations

  • Alternative Fuels:

    • Methanol: Maersk's methanol-powered ships are expected to reduce sulfur oxides (SOx) by 99%, particulate matter by 80%, and CO₂ by 15%. The company aims for a net-zero fleet by 2040.

    • LNG: Reduces CO₂ by 25% and SOx by 90%, with over 300 LNG-powered ships already in operation globally.

    • Ammonia/Hydrogen: Zero-carbon potential, though storage and safety challenges remain.

    • Biofuels: E.g., biodiesel (B30), which can cut CO₂ emissions by 70%.

  • Ship Design Optimization:

    • Air lubrication systems (reducing hull resistance), optimized hull forms, and lightweight materials.

    • Wind-assisted propulsion (e.g., rotor sails, kites) can save 5%–20% in fuel.

2. Operational Management Improvements

  • Slow Steaming: Reducing speed by 10% can lower fuel consumption by 27%.

  • Route Optimization: Utilizing weather routing to avoid headwinds and currents, minimizing voyage time.

  • Port Emissions Reduction: Using shore power to replace auxiliary engines while berthed.

3. Digitalization and Smart Technologies

  • Energy Management Systems (EMS): Real-time monitoring of fuel consumption with optimization recommendations.

  • Big Data and AI: Predictive maintenance to reduce mechanical idling losses.

III. Challenges and Solutions

1. Technological Barriers

  • Lack of Fuel Infrastructure: Only about 150 ports worldwide offer LNG bunkering, and methanol bunkering is even scarcer. Maersk is collaborating with energy companies to establish methanol supply chains in key ports (e.g., Shanghai, Rotterdam).

    • Solution: Public-private partnerships to invest in fuel infrastructure, such as Singapore's "LNG Bunkering Hub Initiative."

2. Cost Pressures

  • Green ships cost 20%–30% more to build. Maersk's methanol-powered ships cost approximately $175 million each, 10%–15% higher than conventional vessels.

    • Solution: Leverage IMO's "Green Financing" mechanisms or apply for subsidies (e.g., China's "Green Ship Subsidy Program").

3. Crew Training Gaps

  • New fuel types require specialized knowledge. Maersk has launched crew training programs for methanol fuel operations.

    • Solution: Enhance green skills training under the STCW Convention.

IV. Conclusion: An Inevitable Choice for the Shipping Industry

Maersk's methanol-powered ship orders mark a concrete step toward zero-carbon transformation in shipping. With tightening regulations, rising carbon taxes, and growing demand for green solutions, energy saving and emission reduction have shifted from "optional" to "essential." Over the next decade, the industry will accelerate its transition to zero carbon, requiring both technological innovation and policy support. Only those who proactively embrace change will thrive in the era of green shipping.